Not a Real Recess, Just a Lull

The great striping question of 2026 was answered Wednesday in sixty-three minutes: the Hunter Park tennis courts stay tennis. Option one — eight courts, court five multi-use for bike polo and futsal, removable nets on the back four "for future consideration" — passed 5-0, rejecting the staff recommendation to dual-line a court for pickleball, and the chamber emptied with such velocity that Chair Bachman improvised a new parliamentary unit: "I'll just wait about a five minute lull in the meeting while we let everybody leave. Not a real recess, just a lull."

What happened during the lull is the story. But first, the vote.

The Handshake Holds

The decisive argument was not acoustic, athletic, or financial. It was a promise. Commissioners Landt and Gardner — the two who were on the dais when Lithia Park's two tennis courts became eight pickleball courts — confirmed the terms of that conversion on the record: Hunter stays tennis. Commissioner Adams, seconding the motion, named the principle: "longitudinal promises between different commissions is important... we made a promise to the tennis community." He voted for it while carrying the other side's best evidence in his own person — he recently waited an hour and forty-five minutes for a Lithia court with his daughter, staying only "because she was far more patient than I was. And we had a wonderful time, by the way."

The public hour ran two minutes a speaker, and the coalition against compromise was the night's most remarkable feature: the pickleball club's chair asked for pickleball-only lines; a 47-year resident who plays pickleball asked for none — "Striping the courts makes it horrible for tennis players and pickleball players" — and the bike polo club asked only for its removable nets: "In case you didn't all know bike polo's a really cool international sport and Ashland's very lucky to have a club for such a small town." Nobody, in two meetings and 150-plus written comments, defended the double-striped court that staff recommended. The commission listened to the actual consensus — the sports want separation and more supply — and voted accordingly. Also preserved for the record, the cautionary tale that haunts every shared-facility idea in this town: the city once built courts on school district land at Helman with no long-term agreement, and the district later erased them. Handshakes with institutions require paper.

Before the main vote, Commissioner Landt attempted a third way — leave court five entirely unlined for a year and gather usage data — a proposal that required three officials and five minutes to decode ("He's asking for no lines at all. So no tennis, no pickleball") and then died without a second, the interim director's assessment hanging gently over it: "I'm just not sure how he would track that."

Democracy for the Empty Room

Then the lull, and then the sequel. With the chamber vacated, Landt asked legal counsel whether the commission could act on what everyone had actually come about, and moved: "direct staff to expediently look for property where pickleball courts could be placed and also look at how funding for that could be procured." The chair seconded it himself, reversed himself twice on whether it needed a formal vote — "Okay, then it's a formal vote. It's fine" — and it passed 5-0. The only concrete pro-pickleball action of the entire process, adopted unanimously, minutes after every pickleball advocate walked out. In his floor speech Landt had sketched a real commitment — eight courts within three years, squeezed from the capital plan — but the motion as passed commits to a property search, nothing more. The distinction will matter in two years, and this paper has now written it down.

Commissioner Weiner's supporting statement carried the night's unexploded ordnance: "it may surprise many, but I actually support expansion of pickleball... but I also will be dogged about ensuring that we have appropriate locations... There's solutions that are available, we refuse to talk about 'em." Which solutions? Refused by whom? He didn't say; nobody asked. The file stays open.

The director's report closed the books on the season's other sagas: the $1.2 million court project goes to bid this month against a $971,000 estimate; the ice rink's tent gets a $12,000 cabling retrofit because the foundation's permanent pavilion — its donor "pretty keen to move" — cannot arrive by winter; the golf course is getting a food concessionaire, prompting the chair's finest moment of curiosity: "do they serve alcohol at the golf course? Yes. I've never heard of a golf course [that] didn't. I was just curious." And drought contingency plans for the parks were confirmed to exist in one sentence and passed over in the next — a sentence this paper suspects will look larger by August.

The tennis players kept their courts. The pickleball players got a promise. Ask the tennis players what a promise from this commission is worth: on Wednesday's evidence, everything. That is precisely why the new one deserves watching.

---

Sourced from machine-generated closed captions of the April 8, 2026 Ashland Parks & Recreation Commission business meeting. Quotations appear as transcribed, lightly conformed to natural speech; names are attached only where the meeting record confirms the speaker. Figures are as stated in open session.